Four sources describe Austin apartment occupancy: two broker market reports, a federal rental survey and an apartment listings snapshot. Each is graded, from primary evidence to context only. Their survey universes and periods are lined up side by side and kept separate rather than averaged. A second agent reviews the resulting claim, confirms each figure matches its source, the scope is stated and contrary evidence is recorded, and marks it supported with qualification before it is linked to the Austin multifamily market and supply pipeline pages. Figures are illustrative.
Every source found
Q3 market report A88.1%
Broker researchStrong secondary
Q3 market report B89.4%
Broker researchStrong secondary
Federal rental survey91.1%
Public dataPrimary
Listings snapshot93%
Listing dataContext only
Cross-reference
Austin apartment occupancyScope checked
Compared on universe, period and measure before any number is used.
SourceUniversePeriodReading
Report AStabilized, 50+ unitsQ3 202588.1%
Report BAll conventionalQ3 202589.4%
SurveyAll rental units202491.1%
ListingsAdvertised unitsSep 202593%
Different universes and periods. Kept side by side, never averaged into one number.
Second-agent review
ReviewVerified
Each figure matches its source
Scope and period stated
Contrary evidence recorded
Context-only sources not relied on
VerdictSupported with qualification
Linked toAustin Multifamily MarketSupply pipeline
▸Gathering every source for the claim…
Illustrative figures — sample data showing the review method.
Sequence — sources gathered · graded by evidence order · lined up by universe, period and measure · kept separate, not averaged · second-agent review · verdict · linked into the graph. Motion — reveals 180–240ms ease-out, one pass of flow per wire; reduced motion resolves to the verdict. Data — illustrative; mirrors cret-librarian-verify dispositions and the evidence order in the KB factuality standard.